I'm a software developer (sometimes I say engineer, but really? An engineer?!). I'm also a creative writer with my pause button pressed. I should be playing, but I'm not.
I came across a phrase today that made me shout 'Yes!', before I brought my hands down in a confused hairy muddle. Another software developer engineer person described themselves on their website as a code poet. A code poet! I love that. It captures something about the joy of coding, but it's also wrong, deep down in my soul wrong.
Of course I'm over-reacting, that's what I do when my mental patterns are on automatic.
A poet has something to express, expresses it in words and imagery, then keeps expressing it through the editing process until the poem is finished, both emotionally and structurally.
A coder takes a specification or set of requirements and produces a piece of software that is easy-to-use, intuitive, fast, and easy to maintain/change/add to.
The parallel that works for me is the reworking to achieve some sort of beauty of form, of elegance, of great design. Poets and coders both do that. But is calling myself a code poet an attempt to pretend writing code is like writing poetry? Saving me from taking the risk of writing real poetry? Of expressing my feelings and having the world read them?
Code is all about logic, and code poetry is elegance and simplicity of logic. It's working on a function, not a feeling. At this stage in my life, I want to work on my feelings. To avoid this work is wrong wrong wrong for me.
Maybe I'm not over-reacting. It is deep down in my soul wrong. Perhaps I'm confusing my 'mental patterns on automatic' with intuition.
Posted at 16:36 in Creative process, Web/Tech, Writing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Creative writing * is hard. Doing it for a living is even harder and, to make it worse, romanticised into something it isn't.
At the end of Romancing the Stone, Kathleen Turner types the last page of her novel straight onto a typewriter (with no editing!), crying her eyes out at the beauty of it, before going outside to climb onboard an enormous yacht to kiss Michael Douglas. This is unrealistic.
Many people strive to write creatively for a living, but proportionally hardly anyone manages it. So why do people bother? I often imagine an idealised writers life - a study with a big desk, views over a garden, books on high shelves all around me, peace and quiet, etc. It's never going to happen. I have realised I only do this when I am not writing.The fundamental activity of creating anything is improvisation. Improvising means starting, and starting is very hard.Improvising/starting is hard because it is painful to make something from inside ourselves, and for it to be not very good. And 99% of it will be average or awful, at least in the beginning, because that's natural selection in action, creativity in it's purest form. The skill is knowing a good idea when it comes and not throwing it away with the rest. Ruthlessness is a key artistic quality.
But another key quality is compassion. You need to allow yourself to improvise the average and the awful to get at the diamonds that come along every now and then.I could design a chair that is elegant, simple, comfortable, functional and beautiful, but that wouldn't serve my inner need to (for example!) put spikes on the seat and arms. In art there is an extra layer of meaning beyond the functional, and I think that meaning comes from inside the artist, expresses something the artist feels very strongly.
The artists work involves improvising, reflecting on it, improvising again with the new insights in mind, reflecting on it, and repeating until the energy is gone. That is when a piece is finished.
The only people who get paid for working on themselves are artists and psychotherapists (I'll explore that in another post). So if you are an artist/writer and you can't get paid for your work, what is the best way of making a living?
* For clarity, my definition of creative writing here is poetry, fiction, life writing, or drama.
Image by Diana Blackwell, via Flickr, under the Creative Commons license.
Posted at 15:39 in Creative process, Writing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
My creative pipework was cracked and fragmented. I had a rule in my head that said 'if you produce a piece of art, then you can feel good', which also means 'if you don't produce a piece of art, you will feel bad'. So, naturally, I pushed hard to create a piece of art.
But artistic work will not be pushed (not art that changes the artist in any meaningful way), so all the pushing did was to try to get more water down the same broken pipe, and I ended up wallowing in self-inflicted misery at my ineptness. I judged myself on the quality and quantity of artistic work I produced, so when I couldn't produce anything I felt like a failure.
Fortunately (naturally!) my unconscious was very clever. I have two writing states: art-making and reflective. I had been pushing myself to make art, and making myself miserable in the process, but I had also been journalling, thinking about what's going on, noting my dreams and my feelings, making montages, drawing conceptual diagrams, and so on. By consciously focussing on the glamorous work, my unconscious selves were able to slip into my journal and begin to repair the damage.
So I have arrived at a rather lovely scary place. A putting myself out there and drawing a line in the sand sort of place.
Every day from this point forward I am going to make something from inside myself, and I am also going to reflect on that making in my journal. I will not go to bed until I have written from both states.
My time of solely working on the pipe is coming to an end. All that creative juice, that elixir, that I thought had been seeping away has actually been repairing the holes and faultlines in my creative process.
So. Onwards!
Posted at 13:39 in Creative process, Writing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
When I sit down to write a story I am already thinking about finishing it, of experiencing the thrill of handing a finely honed piece of work to someone to read.
There is a problem with this. Because it is written into my childhood patterns that if I do something I do it perfectly or not at all, very often I choose not at all so the imaginary figure is not disappointed. The pressure to create something beautiful and important and moving becomes so immense I divert my energy into online shopping or reading the news to the nth level of useless detail. There is no fun in this process. It is joyless.
It's a terribly painful state to be in, where every word produced is compared to some impossible standard and discarded as not good enough. For me, creative writing courses heighten this pain even further. Tutors know what works and why, and since I am incredibly sensitive to criticism, waiting for feedback and the all-important mark would freeze me for weeks. Thinking about word counts and deadlines, with a judgement at the end? Agony.
Paradoxically, the creative writing courses also made me into a writer. I think for me the process had to be painful. My emotional patterns couldn't have it any other way. But by submitting my work to professional writers for feedback I was held to a higher standard, and by doing the course exercises, and writing in my journal about them, I finally unpicked my block on writing.
The deadlines and promise of feedback pulled me upwards, but also scared the hell out of me, and it was in my make-up to torture myself the whole time I was studying. Reading that sentence back makes me very sad.
I finished the course in May, and this past summer I have been wrestling with the absence of deadlines and exercises and feedback. My writing has been personal, not for potential publication or other readers. Noticing this has given me the insights I need to start to write stories again, this time without the artificial framework of a course of study.
I now see I was working on the cracks in my creative process pipework.
Posted at 13:10 in Creative process, Writing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
This month I signed up for a Maths course, did the preparation pack, submitted the first of two warm-up exercises – and stopped.
It wasn't for me. I enjoyed getting back into Maths – I did Physics with Astrophysics at the University of Kent back in the mists of time. I didn't have a plan. But I knew science and astronomy wanted back in to my life. The Maths course wasn't the way forward though. I'm a writer. If I'm doing Maths I'm not writing. Sounds obvious now, huh?
Perhaps I had to try it to know it. This last few weeks I have been reading New Scientist again and having a blast. I still have a fantasy of going back and redoing my degree when I'm retired. In like 30 years. Astrophysics will have gone a long way by then and it'll be totally fresh. It will keep my aging brain in tip-top shape too. Of course that fantasy is nostalgic, old pattern, wishful thinking, but I really do love Physics and Astronomy. It's just at this point in my life I have other fish to pickle.
But what fish?
I asked the OU if they had any spaces on the Level 1 Arts course AA100, but they are full. Must be the economy, the rumoured glut of 18-year-olds who can't get jobs so are holing up in higher education until the storm blows over. So for the first October in three years I am not studying. And that's pretty scary to me. Courses are a comfort blanket – I love deadlines, feedback, marks, books, mind maps, the whole thing – but now I have to find another way.
I could write something? Am I a creative writing journeyman, or am I not?
Posted at 20:53 in Creative process | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I have known of JG Ballard for many years, ever since I took a girl to see Crash on a first date (by mistake, naturally). I was impressed by it, even as my amorous intentions were soundly doused.
But I also knew he wrote Empire of the Sun, and I just wasn't interested in that sort of story in those days. I didn't read much of anything in fact, I had embarked on an MSc in Computer Science and I was a totally IT focussed mofo.
Now, ten years on, drawn equally towards the Arts and Sciences, I have stumbled across him again, but this time as a literary figure. I bought his recently published in paperback short stories part 1 and it's great - full of imagination and crazy scientific ideas that half make sense and philosophical meanderings. Don't get me wrong, they are works from a writer-in-progress. But perhaps because that is where I find myself now, I like that, I take comfort in fact from that.
I like that he didn't seperate his love of science from his writing.
Posted at 15:00 in Writing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
After an extended break in South Wales, I return to my real life with a fresh perspective and some new ideas.
Bodywork - I'm going to concentrate on my fitness and strength, and eat more healthily.
Writing - the voices will become characters will become scenes will become plots will become stories will become a novel - relax and begin.
Literature and film - the BA(Hons) Literature with the OU allows me to survey novels and poetry, but as the free choice course I want to choose Film History to supplement my story knowledge - screenplays and film-making are always at the back of my mind.
House - we are moving, and soon, so I want to get the rooms right for our first few years before the big project to renovate and extend it :-)
Software - when I am in work I will be in work - when I am not I will not! - so no thinking about software or technology outside of work hours, including surfing tech news sites, learning new languages, etc.
Exciting times. I can't wait to work on these things over the next six months. I'll review it all at Xmas, but for now I'm going to write in my journal and find some inspiring role models...
Posted at 16:30 in Creative process | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I'm glad I tried it, but the whole thing left me feeling very uncomfortable about this Web 2.0 thing that's going on. I guess I really mean the sharing of personal stuff thing.
I'm all for connection, but there are people I decided not to keep in touch with for a reason. People I knew in school... there they all are! And they all know each other, or at least they've all signed up to each others Facebook profiles, so you can't be friends with one without suddenly being visible to all these others.
So Facebook is not for me: I'm not comfortable being that visible; I don't want to get in touch with so many people from my past; I'm not convinced my data is safe on those private servers (at least Typepad actually deletes your account!); and I don't want an online identity spread out over the Web (Facebook, Twitter, Typepad, 43 Things, etc).
I'm going to stick to this blog for my public-facing persona. Everything else is going to be anonymous :-)
Posted at 19:48 in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
1979, Moon Cresta, Donkey Kong Jr, fruit machines, little black handheld space invaders with red dots, ZX Spectrum, Manic Miner, Jetpac, typing listings from magazines, The Hobbit, Snowball, Lurking Horror, failing to write my own games, Commodore 64, swapping tapes, Atari ST, swapping disks.
1989, University, Fortran, copying someone else and getting caught, an old PC, word processing, writing bad stories, solitaire.
1998, Pascal, Delphi, software engineering, databases, artificial intelligence, websites, email, first PC of my own, HTML, Quake, Flash, ColdFusion, Javascript, big teams, user interfaces, intimidating Java guys.
2003, Powerbook, PHP, MySQL, Apache, SQL, ColdFusion again, project management, web development, business processes, process re-engineering, marketing, content management systems, maintainability.
Now, ColdFusion, Oracle, PL/SQL, requirements, database redesign and data imports.
Where did the fun go?
Posted at 15:53 in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)